Let’s Be More Specific About “Non-Specific” Back Pain

Let’s Be More Specific About “Non-Specific” Back Pain

This article was originally published in a 2021 newsletter for the Pediatric Society of Greater Dallas. Written by physical medicine & rehabilitation physician Jason R. Petrasic, M.D., FAAPMR

Watch Petrasic give a lecture on this topic a Navigating Back Pain in Adolescents.  It should be no surprise that prevalence numbers for back pain in adolescence steadily increase with age and are nearly identical to that of the adult population by the age of 18. However, young patients and their parents are often surprised when formal evaluations of their insidious onset back pain symptoms yield unremarkable results. Then comes the common “diagnosis” that seemingly no one wants to hear: non-specific back pain. However, arguably this is not a diagnosis at all. The term suggests to the patient that there is no identifiable cause of their symptom. As a patient, or a parent, I want to be able to attribute the symptoms I’m feeling to a diagnosis and know there is an available treatment for my diagnosis. Furthermore, I want to know the underlying cause of my symptom or diagnosis so that I can potentially try to prevent its recurrence in the future. Clearly there are countless cases where a vague symptom or complex of symptoms is not associated with any obvious underlying diagnosis, but my suggestion is that adolescent non-specific back pain is more often a diagnosis of myofascial pain syndrome.
 
Pain is a subjective symptom, and, therefore, is influenced by a multitude of factors including actual tissue injury, previous experiences, mental health disorders, sleep quality, and central processing of pain signals. All of these can influence the intensity and duration of pain experienced from any underlying cause. In the absence of identifiable tissue injury, consider the possibility of unidentifiable tissue injury (i.e., at the cellular level) like the concept of delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) which is the typical muscle soreness, or pain, suffered after an intense bout of exercise in individuals not acclimated to such workouts. There may be a source of pain that is not a result of obvious structural injury and is not observable on currently available imaging modalities, nor is there a routinely used lab study to identify or screen for it. However, there may be a source of stress and tension on the supportive spine muscle(s) in a growing skeleton with disproportionally lower muscle strength, muscle endurance, and flexibility (or any combination of the three) involving key muscles that when the stress exceeds the back’s ability to support it the affected area becomes painfully symptomatic. This is most typical of myofascial pain syndrome where the problem lies at the muscle cellular level. Insidious onset neck, upper, or lower back pain are the most common presenting complaints with symptoms usually being described as intermittent and exacerbated by prolonged sitting and/or standing/walking. Rest or lying down often alleviates symptoms. Common exam findings include full range of motion of the affected area with or without tenderness to palpation, and bilaterally or asymmetrically tight hamstrings (best tested by checking popliteal angles with patient examined in the supine position with ipsilateral hip flexed to 90deg) and/or hip flexor muscles (best tested by performing the Thomas test).

Watch Petrasic demonstrate a thoracolumbar exam in an adolescent.

It is still key to consider more serious structural problems with the spine elements or muscles (or with other adjacent organ systems) when a thorough history, physical examination, and available lab or imaging studies suggests them, but when it is believed or confirmed that those problems are absent or much less likely, then myofascial pain syndrome should be more strongly entertained. This type of diagnosis offers both a long-term treatment, but often more importantly it also offers reassurance that something more serious is not developing or lingering. It should also be noted that myofascial pain syndrome can affect an adolescent competitive athlete seemingly just as easily as their more sedentary counterparts. Physical activities or competitive sports do not necessarily equate to adequate resistance training and stretching as is often assumed, especially in active, growing adolescents. Often kids involved in athletics put even more demand on their “core” and supporting musculature further exacerbating the deficit. A well-rounded, consistently, and persistently performed home exercise program is key to treating this problem along with emphasizing continued exercise and physical activity, and in some cases arranging for supplemental guidance by a physical therapist knowledgeable in spine/back care can help to optimize and accelerate recovery of more constant or severe symptoms.

Comfort level in diagnosing musculoskeletal conditions can often be understandably uneasy when musculoskeletal complaints are being fielded by primary care providers or specialists in other unassociated fields of practice. Myofascial pain syndrome is merely being suggested as a potentially likely benign diagnosis for an otherwise very common complaint that offers improved clarity to families and may help limit anxiety about what may be going missed or undiagnosed.

Learn more about Spondylolysis: A Common Cause of Back Pain in Young Athletes.

Scottish Rite Is Advancing the Use of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound in Pediatric Orthopedics and Beyond

Scottish Rite Is Advancing the Use of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound in Pediatric Orthopedics and Beyond

In many practices, musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK US) is housed solely in radiology. At Scottish Rite for Children, we are fortunate to also have two practitioners with advanced training and certification in using this tool in clinic. Sports medicine physician Jacob C. Jones, M.D., RMSK, and rheumatology practitioner Heather Benham, D.N.P., APRN, CPNP-PC, RHMSUS, use ultrasound to diagnose and treat patients for a variety of conditions.

Together, Jones and Benham have developed a comprehensive course to teach health care professionals the fundamentals of MSK US. Their extensive ultrasound backgrounds and genuine interest in teaching have come together to produce an impactful experience for the attendees.

More than 70 participants from professions including orthopedic surgeons, sports medicine physicians, orthopedic and emergency medicine fellows, physical therapists, advanced practice providers and research personnel have completed the program. Traveling from more than 15 states and two countries, the attendees have all indicated they would be interested in returning for an advanced course and many have referred others to the program.

There are several elements that make this program one-of-a-kind.

  • All faculty have expertise in the use of MSK US in pediatrics.
  • Guest faculty are invited from institutions such as Boston Children’s Hospital, Nationwide Children’s Hospital and Texas Children’s Hospital.
  • Pediatric models participate in the scanning sessions.
  • Injection sessions integrate a variety of tools including custom-made joint models.
  • Didactic and scanning sessions alternate throughout the day.

Jones and Benham look forward to developing an advanced course to offer in conjunction with the fundamentals course. Join our wait list to hear about it first!

Strength and Conditioning Training: It Is Not Just About Getting Strong

What is strength and conditioning?
Strength and conditioning may better be referred to as “physical preparation.” An athlete needs to be physically capable of accomplishing the goals set by the coach to compete in the game. Benefits of strength training go beyond just getting an athlete bigger, stronger and faster. Proper training improves an athlete’s resiliency and confidence in their performance as well. Though preventing injuries may not be directly related to movement and strength training, there are studies that suggest that overuse injuries may be reduced by as much as one-half with appropriate training.

Medical Professionals Programs like this are available on-demand for a limited time Browse Now. A blue and green advertisement for medical professionals

Ideally, an athlete participating in a strength and conditioning program is:

  • At a developmentally appropriate level.
  • At a physically appropriate level.
  • Receiving proper instruction and supervision.
  • In a setting with equipment that is appropriate for both the athlete and the sport.

KEISER YOUTH TRAINING CLASSES KE 0000000 D 10 10 45 St PB 48KG. A group of young boys squatting in a gym

What is training age?
An athlete’s training age may vary across skills or activity. The “training age” is typically much lower than the chronological age. A soccer player may have started playing soccer at age 4 but didn’t start resistance training until age 12. Therefore, that athlete should not begin a strength and condition program at the level of an athlete with five years of resistance training who may be lifting weights and using other forms of resistance.

How should goals be set for a young athlete?
The goals of the program should also be individualized and progress should be tracked. Measures for strength, power, endurance and speed are commonly used. More importantly, an assessment of movement quality should be integrated in the progression. Proper form in fundamental movements should always precede increased resistance or other challenging elements of an exercise.

Younger athletes should learn that “bulking up” is not an appropriate goal for them. These changes will not occur until developmental stages where hormones are present to create those visual changes. What is more likely to occur with movement and strength training in this population are neurological changes that lead to improved neuromuscular control, which is believed to reduce the risk of knee and ankle injuries common in young athletes.

What happens after an injury?
After proper diagnosis, a transition to a supervised strength and conditioning program is ideal only after treatment and rehabilitation for a musculoskeletal injury. An athlete often completes formal physical or occupational therapy before they are ready to return to sport. Therefore, a continued progression of sport-related and other activities help the athlete to complete recovery and prepare for realistic sport environments. Complex movements and distractions that are common during competitions can be integrated into training sessions where variables are controlled.
People squatting in front of a matrix squat rack | HEME 10 45 S 17 18 13 14 15 ᏣᏃ Ec A Ec 16 16 MATRIX 18 14 10 SCOTTISH RITE FOR CHILDREN PORTS MEDICINE Jasirs 处

In a recent program for medical professionals, strength and conditioning coach Justin Haser, M.S., CSCS, and physical therapist Daniel Stokes, P.T., D.P.T., CSCS., explained how strength and conditioning is integrated in the continuum of care for healthy and injured athletes. Watch now on YouTube.

One-of-a-Kind Program Teaches Pediatric Fundamentals in Musculoskeletal Ultrasound

One-of-a-Kind Program Teaches Pediatric Fundamentals in Musculoskeletal Ultrasound

The use of musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK US) is becoming increasingly popular and a point of emphasis in trainee education; however, most training programs focus on conditions in adults. Scottish Rite for Children experts have developed an introductory program to help new users learn about the unique skills and applications in the pediatric setting.

After a successful inaugural course in 2022, Scottish Rite hosted a second MSK US program. The feedback continues to show that we have a unique conference, and we plan to continue offering the program regularly.

This interactive, hands-on program features faculty from a variety of pediatric subspecialities including radiology, rheumatology and sports medicine. Attendees traveled to Frisco, Texas from across the country and internationally with a variety of clinical certifications including physical therapists, sonographers, nurse practitioners, physicians as well as radiology administrators.

Staff were encouraged to hear that all attendees indicated they were “very likely” or “definitely” going to recommend this course to others. Asked about the best part of the program, attendees’ responses are indicative of what future participants should expect:

  • All the hands-on activities intermixed with patient lecture beforehand; the teachers were incredibly kind.
  • Having pediatric patients!! Variety of faculty. Loved having MDS, RMSK, US Sonographer and radiologists. Truly a fantastic course.
  • Short lectures alternating with hands-on
  • Hands-on practice in SMALL groups with EXPERIENCED mentors.
  • It was so helpful having pediatric models – I really learned a lot from the hands-on sessions!
  • Multi-modal approach to learning
  • The dual hands-on and lecture content kept my mind and body awake and elevated the overall learning experience!

Jacob C. Jones, M.D., RMSK, says, “The program is intended to offer an introduction to ultrasound basics including settings, scanning and injection techniques focused on skeletally immature patients.” Throughout the day, more than 20 children and teens ranging from 5 to 19 shared their time with our learners.

After a lecture introducing scanning for rheumatologic conditions, participants observed and practiced scanning patients with active joint inflammation. Nurse practitioner Heather Benham, D.N.P., APRN, CPNP-PC, RhMSUS explains, “We are grateful for these patients and the other children volunteers who make this course so special. It is very difficult to teach these principles when scanning healthy joints.”

During one scanning session, Scottish Rite sonographer Kelly Sherrard, RDMS, demonstrated the techniques of evaluating newborns for developmental dysplasia of the hips. Three-month-old twins served as our models for this exciting addition to the program. The expertise required for this population makes it difficult to include this training in the program, but attendees expressed their appreciation for the demonstration and the complexity of the skill.

Join the email list so you can gain early access to registration for future courses. Our next program is being planned for November 2023.

Infantile Clubfoot Deformity

Infantile Clubfoot Deformity

Clubfoot deformity occurs in one in 1,000 live births, making it the second most common congenital deformity of the foot (after postaxial polydactyly) and one of the most encountered infantile musculoskeletal congenital differences. In contrast to other common infantile foot deformities, such as metatarsus adductus and calcaneovalgus deformities, a clubfoot is not a normal foot that has been “packaged” into an abnormal position. Rather, a clubfoot is a true congenital deformity. There are structural differences inside the foot that create the outward deformity. The shape of the tarsal bones is not the same as that of a child with a normal foot. The elasticity of the soft tissues is much less than in a child with a normal foot, and arterial vessels are often absent or aberrant. Some of the extensor muscles in the leg have been shown to have an exponentially higher number of contractile elements (actin and myosin filaments) and are thus able to generate force at what is essentially a superhuman level.

Despite our understanding of the underlying anatomic and histologic differences in clubfeet, the exact etiology of the deformity remains unknown. Although genetic aberrancies have been identified that are associated with the clubfoot, these appear to be a result of somatic mutations, and thus, the deformity does not appear to run in families with any identifiable pattern of inheritance.

In approaching the treatment of a clubfoot, it is essential for families and providers to understand the presence of these congenital differences because our method of treating clubfoot cannot alter any of them. We can’t change the shape of the bones. We can’t improve the elasticity of the soft tissues. We can’t change the way the blood vessels move into the foot, and we can’t change the power with which certain muscles fire. Therefore, the goal of clubfoot treatment isn’t to create a normal foot. Rather, the goal of treatment is to take a structurally abnormal foot, which is also in an abnormal position, and through a series of casts applied weekly, slowly convert into an abnormal foot structurally that is ultimately in a near normal or completely normal position. Also, this method limits the need for surgery, which creates scarring and stiffness, thereby preserving as much motion of the foot as possible.

The Ponseti method of treatment is the gold standard of care worldwide for clubfoot deformity. This involves weekly serial casting of the involved foot or feet, with each cast applied in a manner to correct a different component of the clubfoot deformity. These casts are very effective at correcting every component of the clubfoot deformity with great success, save for the contracture of the Achilles tendon, which drives an oftentimes rigid equinus (plantarflexion) deformity of the ankle. Approximately 90% of clubfeet require a percutaneous transection of the Achilles tendon. This is performed in the clinic with topical anesthesia in children aged less than 3 months to overcome this component deformity. Following the heel cord tenotomy, the ankle can be acutely dorsiflexed to at least 10 to 15 degrees, and that position is maintained in a final cast that is kept in place for three weeks.

On average, it takes about four weeks of weekly casting to correct the component deformities of the cavus, hindfoot varus, and metatarsus adductus. That brings the foot from what is essentially an upside down and turned inward position to a right-side-up and turned-out position. At that point, if the ankle remains in equinus, this deformity is corrected with a heel cord tenotomy and a final three-week cast, resulting in a total time to achieve full correction of about seven weeks. As we ideally begin treatment within one or two weeks of life, most deformities are corrected by or before 2 months of age.

It cannot be overstated that deformity correction is just the first part of the treatment of a clubfoot deformity. Maintaining that correction is essential and, in many regards, more difficult. Seven weeks in a cast simply cannot overcome months of intrauterine gestation and the various congenital differences present within these feet. Without a means of maintaining correction, corrected clubfeet will universally and quickly revert to their initial position of deformity.
Maintenance of correction is achieved by keeping the ankles dorsiflexed and the feet externally rotated in what is typically called a “boot and bar” construct. While there are a variety of Ponseti-type braces available, most consist of soft silicone lined shoes with soft suede straps. Regardless of whether the deformity is unilateral or bilateral, these shoes are applied to both feet and connected to each other by a bar. The bar holds the shoes at 60 to 70 degrees of external rotation, and the shoe straps hold the ankles in neutral dorsiflexion.

Though bracing protocols vary to some degree, our protocol mirrors that agreed upon at the International Clubfoot Congress and consists of brace use for 23 hours a day until the child begins to pull to stand and 12 hours a night thereafter until age 4. The braces do not interfere with the achievement of developmental milestones, such as sitting up, rolling over, crawling or standing. The transition from full-time to part-time use is based entirely on the fact that once a child is able to pull to a standing position, they will soon spend more time on their feet. At that time, their own body weight will help to keep their feet flat on the ground. Until that time, babies spend most of their time lying down and sitting, during which the feet are held in a relaxed position. That can result in tightening of the heels cords and a recurrence of equinus.

Bracing is most difficult on parents for the first two weeks after the child comes out of their post-tenotomy cast. After seven weeks of casting, having anything other than cast padding surrounding their feet feels different and can cause fussiness. Parents are counseled extensively about this so they can anticipate and develop strategies to keep the braces in place despite frustration on the part of the child.

As mentioned, the use of the brace and the prescribed protocol is essential to long-term treatment success. If the braces aren’t used as recommended, the risk of recurrence of the deformity approaches 100%. These recurrences can be much more difficult to manage in older children than during infancy. It typically requires repeat casting and general anesthesia for either a repeat heel cord tenotomy or a more invasive surgical intervention.

Unfortunately, even when perfect correction is achieved with casting, and parents are compliant with brace use, a percentage of these deformities still recur and require additional treatment due to the structural congenital differences present. Research has demonstrated that with parental bracing compliance, about 80% of clubfoot patients never need any additional treatment. However, despite everyone’s best efforts, 20% of children still need some additional treatment due to recurrence. These recurrent deformities are most commonly the result of an imbalanced muscle pull across the foot due to a relatively overpowered tibialis anterior tendon. When relatively overpowered, this muscle, due to its insertion along the medial aspect of the foot, supinates the foot during dorsiflexion. That results in the touchdown of the lateral border of the foot during the initial stance phase of gait. This supination, in turn, slowly drives the foot inward and into further supination with weightbearing. Such recurrences are easily managed with a brief period of repeat casting to correct any relapsed deformities. That’s then followed by a transfer of the offending tendon to the dorsum of the foot to remove that supination moment during dorsiflexion.

With an experienced team of providers and parental dedication to brace use, these initially dramatic foot deformities can be corrected beautifully and without any long-term deficits or disabilities. However, it is important to educate parents early regarding certain differences in the foot or feet following treatment. A clubfoot is always smaller than a normal foot, sometimes half to a full shoe size smaller than an unaffected contralateral foot. In addition, the calf musculature of children with clubfoot tends to be smaller, though this size difference does not appear to affect strength. These differences are strictly cosmetic and do not alter function. The goal of clubfoot treatment is to allow a foot or feet to sit flat to the ground, have as much flexibility as possible, allow the child to wear any shoes they want, play any sports they want, have any job they want, and do whatever they want with the foot. In achieving this, their corrected clubfoot will function no differently than a normal foot and will never limit a child in any way in any activity they desire.

Download the PDF.

Dr. Anthony I. Riccio is a pediatric orthopedic surgeon and the Director of the Center for Excellence in Foot at Scottish Rite for Children.