The Limping Child

The Limping Child

Article originally published in an issue of the Pediatric Society of Greater Dallas newsletter. Written by Assistant Chief of Staff Emeritus Charles E. Johnston, M.D. 

Print the PDF

It may seem obvious to say, but a limp is never a normal finding, and in fact can be an ominous symptom in any child. The differential diagnosis can be fairly extensive, but by far the most important feature is whether or not the limp is associated with pain, known as an antalgic limp, because such a limp can be the presenting symptom of a serious infection, malignancy, or repetitive injury that requires timely and appropriate management.

Diagnosis – Gait and Physical Exam
The history and physical examination are probably the most important aspects of the evaluation of a limping child. Is there really a limp? It is not always obvious that a child, especially a toddler who cannot communicate, is, in fact, limping, especially when the limp is painless. The default position is that the mother is always right until proven otherwise, and of course parents will not hesitate to bring the limp to the physician’s attention.
One must remember that all toddlers fall, they probably fall every day, and most falls are not witnessed nor are related to an underlying sinister process. Recent medical history may be totally negative or clouded with uncertainty, unless there is an important birth history or recent febrile illness.

Physical examination of a child with a limp complaint where the gait disturbance isn’t that obvious requires that he/she be observed in a quiet area with a minimum of the upper half of the buttocks exposed. Placing an ink mark on each sacral dimple, and observing the undiapered gait from behind, will provide the best opportunity to confirm “waddling”, or pelvic rise and fall during stance phase by watching the sacral dots and the shoulders shifting concomitantly. Toe-walking, however subtle, may be another sign confirming a painless limp.

In an antalgic limp, the stance phase is shortened n the affected side, as the child avoids weight-bearing due to pain by getting off the affected extremity as quickly as possible. Refusal to bear weight on one or both lower extremities raises the additional possibility of axial (spinal) involvement, or a systemic illness. An antalgic limp demands a more urgent evaluation, especially if the child has evidence of illness (fever, malaise, poor appetite, failure to thrive) or a suggestive recent medical history.

The next step is pain localization, especially if the child is calm enough for palpation. With the child seated on a parent’s lap, or an equivalent relaxed position on an examination table, one should begin a systematic palpation of both extremities, beginning with the non-affected side‘s toes and foot, and then gradually working up the leg to gently move the ankle through its range of motion, moderately compress/ squeeze the tibia and fibula every 3-5 cm along the diaphysis, gently move the knee through its range of motion, squeeze the thigh, and then move the hip through its range of motion. By starting with the non-affected side (if that can be determined) and placing the child (and parent) at ease, the likelihood of eliciting an interpretable response when the affected area is approached is enhanced. Additionally, one should never pass up the chance to examine a sleeping child, proceeding as just described but with the affected side, trying to localize the problem before the child abruptly awakes when the painful region is reached. Obviously, identification of the painful area is critical to guide the ordering of subsequent imaging studies, which will be diagnostic.

Refusal to walk, or in the older child that refuses to bend over to pick up an object on the floor, may identify a rigid, guarded back as the presentation of discitis/vertebral osteomyelitis or tumor.

Painless limping suggests either a developmental abnormality of the hip, such as dislocation or an early case of synovitis (e.g. transient, Legg-Perthes); a congenital leg abnormality such as a discoid meniscus, patella mechanism problem, or limb reduction deformity (short femur, coxa vara); a neuromuscular diagnosis, determined best by noting apparent weakness, abnormal tone (hypo- or hypertonic) or poor balance; or a fairly obvious limb length discrepancy. The classic “waddle” of a congenital hip dislocation is identified by the drop of the unaffected hemi-pelvis (unilateral involvement) during single limb stance on the affected side, coupled with a trunk lean or shoulder shift toward the affected side, a compensation for maintaining the body center over the unstable hip joint. Static physical examination should confirm a restriction of motion or, in the case of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), a possible “clunk” if the hip can actually be reduced with abduction and flexion (the “Ortolani” maneuver). Generally, in the walking aged child, the latter cannot be demonstrated because the dislocation has become more “fixed” and thus the main physical finding will be restricted abduction in flexion of the hip in question.

Keep in mind that hip pathology pain can be referred to the lower thigh or knee. Both Legg-Perthes and slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) can present with “knee pain” as chief complaint. The clinician will note on gait inspection that the foot is externally rotated in SCFE, while the patient walks with a stiff, non-moving hip due to synovitis in Perthes.

Muscle weakness or decreased tone, especially of more proximal muscle groups (e.g. hip girdle muscles) may be confirmed by the Gower sign, where a child will “climb” up their legs when asked to stand up from a sitting or lying position on the floor. Toe walking, especially unilateral, or a child with spasticity or seeming rigidity from increased tone, may be the first recognized sign of cerebral palsy.

Imaging Studies
Plain radiographs in the acute setting are usually indicated to survey the area of concern, the key is to pinpoint that area in the physical exam. In acute infections (< 1 week), bone changes (periosteal reaction, lytic lesions), may not yet be visible, but deep soft tissue swelling may be visible to confirm the likelihood of an inflammatory fluid collection purulence.

For a non-acute condition (painless limp), plain radiographs may provide the exact diagnosis of a dislocated hip, Perthes or a SCFE. Remember to order a lateral view of the hip when considering either the latte 2 diagnoses, as a single AP view may not be diagnostic.

Ultrasound of the painful suspected septic hip is a standard imaging modality looking for an effusion. Actually, ultrasound can be useful for any joint suspected of septic effusion and can also confirm the soft tissue fluid collection of pyomyosistis or abscess, and thus direct a needle aspiration for culture.

MRI is the best and most precise modality, but should NOT be the first-line imaging to be considered in the majority of cases. Because of the need for anesthesia, MRI should NOT be used as a screening test, but is best used to determine the need for surgery, as well as the extent of the surgery to adequately drain a fluid collection or treat a bony lesion, or to direct a needle biopsy of a suspected bone or soft tissue neoplasm in the non-acute setting. A common scenario for suspected infection would be to review the focused MRI imaging immediately and then proceed to the operating room under the same anesthetic.

Similarly, bone scan is rarely indicated as a screening test, due to the amount of radiation and the greater degree of information obtained by MRI. CT scan is valuable for surgical planning, and may play an important diagnostic role in certain axial (spine, pelvis) lesions of bone that are not well visualized by MRI. Again, CT is NOT a screening modality.

Lab Tests
Any child suspected of an infection of musculoskeletal origin should have a CBC with differential, sedimentation rate (ESR) and C reactive protein (CRP) determinations. WBC count and differential may help to differentiate a bacterial from a viral synovitis by virtue of both absolute count (e.g. < 10000 = non-bacterial) as well as percent of neutrophils vs. lymphocytes. With a ESR > 40 and WBC > 12000, combined with a painful joint or refusal to bear weight, the chance of a septic arthritis exceeds 70 %. Add a fever and the incidence  exceeds 90%. Minimally elevated ESR and CRP provide evidence of a non-inflammatory acute process. Don’t overlook an unusually high or low WBC count, and/or elevated platelet count, as these may be an early indication of leukemia which can present with the clinical picture of bone pain/limp/refusal to walk in a child with malaise and systemic symptoms of illness.

Final Thought
The key to diagnosis and treatment for the limping child is a well-performed physical exam after obtaining key points of history. Localizing the “lesion” in the acute setting is critical to the timely diagnosis and management of what may be a life- or limb-threatening condition.

Sports Specialization and Overuse Injuries in Young Athletes

Sports Specialization and Overuse Injuries in Young Athletes

Article originally published in the Pediatric Society of Greater Dallas newsletter. Written by sports medicine physician Jane S. Chung, M.D.

Print the PDF

The good old days of unstructured child driven “free play” has been largely replaced by the current sports culture of structured sport specialization patterns, which involves year-round training and participation. Many kids often play for multiple teams of the same sport and there seems to be a trend of picking a single sport and training at a very high level and intensity at an earlier age.

The concept of specialization was first proposed by Ericsson and his colleagues in 1993, stating that to reach expert performance, one must practice 10,000 hours over 10 years in that specialized field, adding that one is also more likely to succeed if training is begun at an earlier rather than later age.

Although there is no validation that early sport specialization is a requirement for athletic success and despite the growing evidence that early sport specialization may negatively impact an athlete’s physical and mental health long term, the trend towards early specialization continues to grow as parents, coaches and athlete’s dream of reaching collegiate scholarships and playing at an elite level. The reality is that a very small percentage of aspiring young athletes reach this status, with only 3-11% of high school athletes going on to compete at the NCAA level and only 1% receiving an athletic scholarship, with as few as 0.03-0.5% of high school athletes making it to the professional level.

Sport specialization is defined as “intensive year-round training in a single sport at the exclusion of other sports.” Sports specialization can be divided into two groups:

  1. Early specialization (before puberty)
  2. Late specialization with early diversification (sampling)

The benefits of early diversification include allowing the child to experience different physical, cognitive and psychosocial environments and exposure to various types of sports. Emphasis should be placed on learning the fundamental movement skills such as running, throwing a ball, jumping and kicking at the younger ages which sets the foundation for later building on more complex skills as they progress in age and sport.

Current evidence suggests that for the majority of sports, delaying specialization until after puberty (15 or 16 years of age) with early diversification and participation in a variety of sports is more favorable for long term health and future athletic success. However, there are certain sports such as gymnastics, figure skating and diving in which early specialization may be required as peak performance in these sports occurs before an athlete’s full physical maturation.

Overuse
There is concern that early specialization and intense training at an early age may result in negative outcomes such as increased risk of injuries such as overuse injuries and increased psychological stress, potentially leading to drop out from sports and burnout. However, there are other risk factors that have been identified for causing overuse injuries (See Table 1).

Table 1
A table showing the categorization of risk factors for overuse injury | Categorization of Risk Factors for Overuse Injury Intrinsic Risk Factors Growth-related factors • Susceptibility of growth cartilage to repetitive stress • Adolescent growth spurt Previous injury Previous level of conditioning Anatomic factors Menstrual dysfunction Psychological and developmental factors • Athlete specific Extrinsic Risk Factors Training workload • Rate • Intensity • Progression Training and competition schedules Equipment/footwear Environment Sport technique Psychological factors • Adult and peer influences DiFiori JP, Benjamin HJ, Brenner JS, et al. Overuse injuries and burnout in youth sports: a position state- ment from the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48: 287-288.
Skeletally immature athletes are also susceptible to unique overuse injuries involving the growth plates and apophyses. The risk of injury in a young athlete also varies upon factors including training volume, intensity, level of competition and pubertal maturity. Studies have shown that sport specialization is an independent risk factor for injury and that those athletes who participated in more organized sports compared to free play in a ratio greater than 2:1, had an increased risk for an overuse injury.  In general, the risks of injury from intense training and specialization seem to be multifactorial and variable, dependent on age, growth rate, pubertal maturation and level of competition.

Burnout
It is important as pediatricians to keep burnout in mind when treating young athletes. Burnout can result from excessive chronic stress which the athlete may be experiencing, and can manifest as decreased appetite, poor sleep, decreased performance, low self-esteem and ultimate withdrawal from sport. Sports or activities that they used to enjoy are no longer fun or pleasurable. For those health care providers taking care of young athletes, it is important to recognize burnout as a sequela of overtraining and to be aware of its manifestations and presentations. The diagnosis of burnout and overtraining is made through the athlete’s history and recognition of various nonspecific symptomatology which the athlete may present with. Further imaging and laboratory studies should be performed only if clinically indicated. Physical and mental rest are key components for treatment. A multidisciplinary approach should be taken for treatment, involving the athlete, parents, coaches, treating physician and sometimes a mental health specialist.

Our goal as pediatricians is to help kids stay healthy, happy and active for life. To prevent burnout/overtraining and overuse injuries in young athletes, here are some tips (See Figure 1).

Figure 1
Guidance for sports specialization and intensive training in young athletes | Guidance for Sports Specialization and Intensive Training in Young Athletes RECOVERY Taking 1 month off from a sport at least 3 times per year allows for physical and psychological recovery. INJURY PREVENTION 00000 Having at least 1 to 2 days off per week from a sport can decrease the chance for injuries. PRIMARY FOCUS Learn and develop lifelong physical activity skills and enjoyment. MAINTAIN A VARIETY Participating in multiple sports decreases the chance of injuries, stress and burnout. SPECIALIZATION Delaying specializing in a single sport until late adolescence may lead to a higher chance of accomplishing athletic goals. EARLY DIVERSIFICATION AND SPECIALIZATION Provides a greater chance of lifetime sports and physical activity involvement, and possibly elite participation. Adapted from Brenner J. S. Sports Specialization and Intensive Training in Young Athletes. Pediatrics 2016, volume 138, number 3
Learn more about pediatric sports medicine.

Spinal Tethering Recently FDA Approved

Spinal Tethering Recently FDA Approved

Article originally published in fourth quarter, 2019 issue of the Pediatric Society of Greater Dallas newsletter. Written by Chief of Staff Daniel J. Sucato, M.D., M.S.

Print the PDF

In August 2019, the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) approved a new technique to treat patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) known as the vertebral body tether (VBT) or “tethering” for short. The technique is mainly  for children who are still growing and whose curves are approaching or are in the range for traditional surgical treatment. It was first studied in animal models and more recently in a variety of clinical series. This short review will discuss scoliosis in general, the traditional treatments for this condition, the rationale for tethering, the early results and some perspective on its utility in patients today.

What is Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?
Scoliosis comes in a variety of forms with the most common being adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), defined by scoliosis in normal patients between 10 and 18 years of age without an underlying syndrome or congenital abnormalities of the vertebrae or ribs. The “idiopathic” aspect of the title refers to the fact that we do not understand the underlying etiology for the occurrence of the scoliosis. Despite an incomplete understanding of the cause of AIS, we do recognize that curve progression occurs when children have growth of the spine (especially rapid growth) or when the curve measures greater than 50 degrees at the completion of growth. Based on these well-accepted facts, the traditional treatments for scoliosis are threefold: observation, bracing and surgery.

Traditional Treatment
We observe small curves (<20 degrees) in children who are still growing or larger curves (up to 50 degrees) in those children who are done growing. Bracing is reserved for growing children with curves between 20 and 45 degrees with the goal of preventing curve progression during their growing years and to avoid surgical treatment. Braces come in two main categories, the all-day/nighttime brace (used for all curve types) and the only nighttime brace (predominantly used for lumbar or thoracolumbar curves between 20 and 35 degrees).

Traditional surgery is indicated for curves greater than 50 degrees or for curves which will inevitably be greater than 50 degrees (i.e. a 45 degrees curve in a 10 year old who is in the middle of their growth spurt and is a Risser 0). Posterior spine implants are used to obtain correction of the spine and then to hold the spine in that position until the spine fuses. Today, surgery is exceptionally successful with very few complications or revision surgeries, and patients are often back to their full activities including athletics and sports three to six months after surgery.

What is Tethering?
The concept of growth modulation is applied in the lower extremities when a surgical procedure is used to partially limit the growth of the physis (growth plate) to improve a deformity. This has had great success for children primarily because we know the exact growth of the distal femur (1 cm/year) and the proximal tibia (0.6 cm/year). We can “tether” the medial or lateral growth plate to allow the other side of that same growth plate to improve the deformity and, when correction has been achieved, the small implants can be removed. Depending on many factors, correction occurs within six months up to a few years.

How is Tethering Used in the Spine?
This same concept has been applied to the spine in which the tether is placed on the convex aspect of the spinal curvature to slow the growth of this side of the spine, which, in theory, allows the concave aspect to continue to grow. This “internal brace” has the theoretical advantage of correcting the curve while allowing the patient to be very active, without the need to use a brace, and therefore maintains some flexibility of the spine. The tether is placed in the front of the spine using a thoracoscopic approach with four small incisions, in which a single screw is placed in each vertebral body which is then attached to a flexible tether made of polyethylene polymer. The tether is tensioned at the time of surgery to gain some correction of the curve and the patient is followed after that to monitor the spine with respect to curve correction and evidence of complications. This technique is best applied to patients who have thoracic curves (the most common curve pattern in AIS) but can also be applied to lumbar curves although this is not as well accepted and is controversial.

What are the Risks?
The theoretical advantages of the technique must be weighed against the challenges that have been seen with the follow-up of these patients and can be categorized into two main areas. Understanding the exact indications for the procedure to avoid under correction or overcorrection and avoid breakage of the tether. The indication for the tether is as an alternative for bracing.

Under Correction and Overcorrection
However, if a tether is placed in a small curve of 25 degrees in a growing child then overcorrection occurs. This happens with a reversal of the curve so that the convexity switches from the right to the left and requires reoperation for tether removal and potential treatment of this left-sided curve.

Breakage
The other risk is that the flexible tether has a relatively high chance of breaking due to the flexibility that remains in the spine. When this occurs, a revision surgery may be required because correction is no longer possible over that segment(s).

How Does Tethering Compare to Alternative Treatments? 
In this population of growing children, bracing is a highly successful treatment (>70%) without the risks of surgery. The success is of course related to the quality of the custom-made braces and requires monitoring of compliance of the brace. At Scottish Rite for Children, we use a temperature sensor in the brace  and there is now a phone app to monitor in real-time. Also, a definitive fusion procedure leads to outstanding outcomes with a very low rate of reoperation.

In summary, tethering of the spine has promise as an alternative to bracing to maintain partial spine flexibility, provide an opportunity for curve correction and potentially avoid a fusion procedure. It is important to provide a clear description of the results and complications with each patient and family prior to deciding if this technique is right for them.

Learn more about scoliosis and our research in the Center for Excellence in Spine.